Aras, I. et al. (2016). Class II subdivision treatment with the Forus Fatigue Resistant Device vs intermaxillary elastics. Angle Orthod., October epub.
Aras I. et al. (2017). Comparison of stepwise versus single-step advancement with the functional mandibular advancer in Class II division 1 treatment, Angle Orthod., 87:82-87.
Burkhardt DR, McNamara JA, Baccetti T. Maxillary molar distilization or mandibular enhancement. A cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and Herbst appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:108-16.
Chen,J.Y. Analysis of efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop.,2002:122:470-476.
Collett,A.R. Current concepts on functional appliances and mandibular growth stimulation. Dental J.,2000;45:173-178.
Dolce, C., McGorray, SP., Brazeau, L., King, GJ., Wheeler, TT. (2007). Timing of Class II treatment: Skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 132:481-489.
Franchi, L. et al. (2011). Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in Class II patients. Angle Orthod., 81:678-683.
Ghislanzoni, LT et al. (2011). Treatment and posttreatment outcomes induced by the mandibular advancement repositioning appliance. A controlled clinical study. Angle Orthod., 81:684-691.
Nelson,B., Hagg, U., Hansen, K., Bendeus, M. (2007). A long-term follow up study of Class II malocclusion correction after treatment with Class II eleastics or fixed functional appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 132:499-503.
Livieratos FA, Johnston LEJr. A comparison of one-stage and two-stage nonextraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:118-131.
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanji Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S et al. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or Twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:128-37.
O’Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S et al. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:234-43.
Palcha MM. et al. (2016). A comparison of the efficacy of fixed versus removable functional appliances in children with Class II malocclusion. A systematic review. Eur J Orthod.,38:621-630.
Pancherz H. The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: A cephalometric long-term investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:220-233.
Pancherz H. The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod 1997;3:232-243.
Pancherz,H. Treatment timing and outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.,2002:121:559.
Pancherz H, Fackel U. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of class II malocclusions treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:209-218.
Proffit WR, Tulloch JFC. Preadolescent Class II problems: Treat now or wait? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2002;121:560-562.
Siara-Olds NJ, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V et al. Long-term dentoskeletal changes with bionator, Herbst, Twin Block and MARA functional appliances. Angle Orthod 2010;80:18-29.
Sunnak R et al. Is orthodontics prior to 11 years of age evidence-based. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2015;43:477-486.
Tufekci E. et al. (2016). Current trends in headgear use for the treatment of Class II malocclusions. Angle Orthod.,86:584-589.
Tulloch JFC, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: Progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:62-72.
Tulloch JFC, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:533-542.
Tulloch JFC, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:391-400.
Tulloch JF, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:340-347.
Tulloch JFC, Proffit WR. Phillips C. Outcomes in a 2-phase randomized clinical trial of early Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:657-67.
Tuncay OC, Tulloch JFC. Apparatus criticus: methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:531-536.
Turnock C and Woods, M. (2016). The Herbst Appliance and the Activator: Influence of vertical facial pattern. Aust Orthod J;32:130-138.
von Bremen J. and Pancherz H. Efficiency of early and late Class II division 1 treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.,2002:121:31-37.
Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Dolce C, King GJ. The timing of Class II treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:S66-S70.
Zymperdikas VF etal. (2016), Effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod.,38:113-126.